Poverty, Inequality and Social Justice in Nonmetropolitan
America by
Don E.
Albrecht
Confronting
Poverty: Potential National and Community Responses
Since the War
on Poverty was declared four decades ago, numerous programs have been
implemented in an effort to eliminate, or at least reduce, poverty levels.
Since these programs have not succeeded in making substantial inroads in
reducing poverty, they have been considered to be a failure by many. This is
certainly not completely the case. Many of the programs originally implemented,
or in some cases expanded, in the 1960s, such as Medicare, Medicaid, Head
Start, Food Stamps and the Job Corps are still in operation today. The economic
well-being of millions of people has been enhanced by these programs (Danziger
et al. 1994). Many of these programs have been successful in meeting their
stated goals. The proportion of the population in poverty among groups
specifically targeted by these programs has been greatly reduced. For example,
since Social Security payments were tied to inflation, most of the elderly have
been lifted out of poverty (Burtless 1994), and poverty rates among the elderly
are now lower than among working age people. There is no doubt that poverty in
this country would be much worse without these programs.
In considering
the future of national poverty programs, it should be remembered that the
economic and social changes discussed earlier have made poverty reduction
efforts much more difficult than in the past. These altered economic and social
conditions must be considered if future programs are to be successful. Each of
these economic and social changes represents structural changes in our society.
It is essential that programs deal with the structural roots of poverty if they
are to be successful. To a large extent, cultural values and attitudes are a
consequence of structural circumstances. Four important structural changes will
be mentioned here. First, economic restructuring, where millions of
middle-income manufacturing jobs have been replaced by largely low-income
service jobs means that many people with full-time employment are still living
in or near poverty. Thus, implementing employment programs to lift people out
of poverty will be problematic. The success of the Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 has been reduced because getting a
job does not necessarily mean getting out of poverty (O'Connor 2001).
Overcoming these employment obstacles will be extremely difficult simply
because there are fewer middle income jobs and more low-income jobs available
than in the past. Second, if future policies are to be effective, they must
specifically target minority populations. There have been significant increases
in minority populations in recent decades, and since minority poverty rates
remain high, persons in poverty are much more likely to be minority than in the
past. Third, the number of people living in single-parent families has greatly
increased in recent decades, and as a result, the majority of families living
in poverty at the present time are female-headed. This is of great concern
because it is estimated that at least half of the current generation of
children will spend at least part of their life between birth and age 18 living
in a home with a single-mother (Garfinkel and McLanahan 1994). Thus, programs
to strengthen families and to provide assistance to individuals living in
single-parent families are paramount. Fourth, in the next few years, the Baby
Boom generation will begin to reach retirement age. This means that the costs
of maintaining programs to keep the elderly from poverty will increase
dramatically.
Community
leaders in nonmetropolitan areas are constrained by existing national and state
programs as they attempt to implement local poverty reduction efforts. In many
cases, nonmetro communities are also constrained by the fact that municipal
budgets do not allow them to employ full-time professionals to seek grants and
the funding of programs to assist communities in their efforts to increase
incomes and reduce poverty. Despite these constraints, efforts must proceed. It
should be remembered that successful poverty reduction programs must be based
on changing problematic structures. For example, programs to provide more
quality jobs or improve schools will generally provide better results than
efforts to change attitudes.
The first path
that should be explored by nonmetro community leaders is to improve the number
and quality of employment opportunities available to local workers. The
obstacles and opportunities faced in attempts to attract jobs and businesses
vary greatly from community to community. For many communities these obstacles
are significant. Historically, the most prominent sources of employment in most
nonmetro communities have been agriculture and manufacturing. Employment
opportunities in both of these industries are declining. Many nonmetro
communities have been heavily dependent on a single industry, and when this
industry declines the impacts are extensive. Further, the benefits of
attracting service jobs may not be very great because of the low-pay associated
with many service jobs. Even if efforts are made to attract service sector
jobs, research is showing that some nonmetro communities have significant
advantages over other nonmetro communities in attracting these jobs.
Specifically, communities with natural amenity advantages are generally more
successful in attracting service jobs than communities lacking these amenity
advantages (Albrecht 2004).
There are
opportunities to attract jobs that were not generally available to nonmetro
communities in the past. Of prime significance are rapid developments in
computers, the Internet, and other forms of information technology. With
computers, information can now be stored, accessed, and transferred in ways
almost unimaginable a few years ago. Further, this technology has become so
cheap that it is available to large numbers of individuals and companies. Of
major importance to nonmetropolitan communities is that the emergence of
computers and information technology has greatly reduced the relevance of
location (Brown and Swanson 2003; Falk et al. 2003). To a greater extent than
at any time in the past, families and firms can establish their homes and
places of business where they wish and still be connected to the necessary
markets and customers. In the past, many individuals and firms were obligated
to locate near metropolitan centers because these communities, by definition,
had the advantage of being nearer to markets and larger numbers of customers.
Now many of those who wish to can still be connected to the necessary markets
and customers and at the same time enjoy the advantages of nonmetro living.
Further, in the past, persons residing in nonmetro areas were generally
required to live near where traditional resources (such as forests, fisheries
or the soil, water and climate essential for agriculture) were available. This
is no longer the case. Nonmetro communities now have the potential of
attracting high quality jobs that were previously limited to metro communities
(Albrecht 2004).
Finally, a key
to any local community effort to increase economic well-being and reduce
poverty is education. Local schools are an arena where community residents can
have a direct and significant impact. The relationship between a quality
education and economic security is much greater now than in the past. The
economic structure transformations described earlier are resulting in the
United States moving from a middle-class nation to a dualistic nation. In
recent years, there has been an increase in the number of high-income jobs, an
increase in the number of low-income jobs, and a decline in the number of
middle-income jobs. Virtually all of the high quality jobs require advanced
education or specialized training. In the past, individuals lacking the
advanced education or specialized training needed to attain a high-quality job,
could generally obtain a middle-income jobs, often in the manufacturing sector.
This is no longer the case. In the economy of today, individuals who fail to
qualify for the high-quality jobs will often be relegated to one of the growing
number of low-quality jobs. It is vital that local schools prepare their young
people for this world.
back next |