Poverty, Inequality and Social Justice in Nonmetropolitan
America by
Don E.
Albrecht
Factors Impacting Future Poverty and Inequality Patterns
Since the War
on Poverty began, the number of persons living in poverty has remained
relatively stable and the percent of the population in poverty has declined
despite structural changes that create circumstances conducive to increased
levels of poverty and inequality. The magnitude of these structural changes is
likely to increase in future years. Based on the earlier discussion of
structural theories, it can be expected that these economic and social changes
will have major implications for future poverty and inequality trends. Most
prominent among these structural trends are economic restructuring and a
variety of changing social conditions. Each of these factors will be discussed
in this section.
Economic Restructuring, Poverty and Inequality
Among the more
profound changes affecting American society in recent decades are transitions
in the way that people make a living (Bluestone and Harrison 1982; Sassen
1990). This economic restructuring has resulted in America moving from an
agricultural society where most families depended on farming, to an industrial
society where manufacturing comprised the largest segment of the country's GDP,
to the post-industrial society of today where a majority of the labor force is
employed in the service sector (Morris and Western 1999). Economic
restructuring is important because agricultural jobs are fundamentally
different from manufacturing jobs, which in turn are fundamentally different
from service jobs. Different industries have different wage structures and
different work schedules for their employees; they require different levels and
types of education; they differ in the types of relationships that exist
between owners and workers; and they vary in the proportion of the workforce
that is either male or female. All of these and other factors are likely to
have major implications for the economic stability of individuals and families,
relationships within families, the strength of community institutions,
political outlooks and numerous other aspects of life (Albrecht 1998). Of
specific importance for this paper, researchers have found that economic
restructuring has significant implications for poverty levels and the extent of
inequality.
Communities in
the nonmetropolitan United States have been dramatically altered by two major
economic structure transformations that began during the twentieth century, and
continue into the early twenty-first century. The extent of the impacts of
these economic structure transformations vary greatly from one community to
another. The first transformation occurred primarily through the middle decades
of the twentieth century, though it continues today on a reduced basis. This
transformation consists of a massive decline in agricultural employment,
largely offset, at least initially, by increased manufacturing employment
(Fuguitt et al. 1989; Johnson 1989). The second transformation has been
unfolding since the late 1970s, though its full implications are just now being
felt and understood. This transformation consists of a decline in both
agricultural and manufacturing employment (Perrucci et al. 1988) with
corresponding increases in service sector employment (Albrecht 2004; Kassab and
Luloff 1993).
The First Economic Structure Transformation
Historically,
nonmetropolitan America was economically dominated by the agricultural sector.
Even into the middle decades of the twentieth century, farmers were by far the
most numerous occupational group in the country. In 1940, for example, the farm
population comprised nearly one-fourth of all U.S. residents and a majority of
nonmetro residents (Albrecht and Murdock 1990; Beale 1978). Then the first
economic structure transformation began to unfold. Largely as a result of
technological developments that greatly increased the labor capacity of farmers
and allowed them to operate progressively larger farms, there was a rapid
increase in the size of the average farm, and a corresponding decline in the
number of farms (Dorner 1983; Paarlberg 1980). Between 1940 and 2002, the
number of farms declined from over six million to less than two million, while
the farm population was reduced from 30 million to 3.9 million. This transition
led to what Beale (1993) described as the largest peacetime movement of people
in U.S. history as millions of people left the farm, many of them migrating to
metropolitan areas. As the number of farm workers plummeted, the booming
manufacturing sector began moving to nonmetro communities where industry could
employ displaced farm workers and at the same time avoid unionization and keep
labor costs lower (Fuguitt et al. 1989). The availability of manufacturing jobs
in nonmetro communities slowed the pace of nonmetro to metro migration.
Eventually, manufacturing employment far exceeded agricultural employment even
in nonmetro areas.
The Second Economic Structure Transformation
Following World
War II, the American manufacturing sector began a period of spectacular growth
and it was soon apparent that the United States could best be described as an
industrial nation rather than an agricultural nation. Manufacturing was the
dominant industry in both metro and nonmetro areas from shortly after World War
II until the late 1970s, when it became apparent that another major economic
structure transformation was occurring in the United States. At this time, the
number and proportion of manufacturing jobs began an initial decline (Bluestone
and Harrison 1982; Sassen 1990) that has since increased in scope and magnitude
(Morris and Western 1999). Some of the manufacturing jobs were lost as a result
of technological advancements where machines replaced human labor in the
production process. Many other manufacturing jobs have been outsourced to
foreign countries by multi-national corporations to take advantage of lower
wages in these countries (Harrison and Bluestone 1988). The loss of
manufacturing has been offset by extensive growth in service sector
employment.
back next |